http://uk.youtube.com/user/FightForYourFreedom
taking liberties!!!
this is a video
Tuesday, October 30, 2007
Friday, October 26, 2007
Unusual Amount of Put Options Just Before 9/11 Attack
http://www.lesechos.fr/info/marches/4620847.htm
Tuesday October 02nd 2007, 5:07 pm
Filed under: 9/11, 9/11 Truth, American Airlines, Bank of America, Bin Laden Trades, Economy, False Flag, JPMorgan, Merrill Lynch, State Sponsored Terrorism, Stock Market, United Airlines, World Trade Center, citigroup, put options
9/11: Unusual volumes on Put Options just before the attack. Swiss study
9/11 Blogger
September 30, 2007
September 11, 2001: Unusual volumes on Put Options just before the attack. Swiss study
Says the 11 September 2007 issue of Les Echos, the leading French financial newspaper ]
The paper continues:
Six years after the attacks, a study has been released by two professors of the university of Zurich on the atypical volumes of put options placed before the attacks on World Trade Centre.
The authors, one specialist in derivatives, the other a specialist in econometrics, studied the options to sell (put options), used to speculate on the fall in the price of 20 large American groups.
(Read the full the French article below – Lesage translation)
“Atypical volumes, very rare on certain titles, lead to suspicions of insider trading. ” Six years after the attacks of World Trade Center, it is the disconcerting conclusion of a recent study by Marc Chesney and Loriano Mancini, professors at the University of Zurich.
The authors, one a specialist in derivatives, the other a specialist in econometrics, worked on the options to sell, used to speculate on the fall, of 20 great American groups, in particular in aeronautics and finance.
Their analysis relates to the transactions carried out between the 6 and September 10, 2001 compared to the average volumes recorded over long period (ten years for the majority of the companies).
The two specialists, in addition, calculated the probability of several options of the same sector having significant volumes in a few days.
“We tried to see whether the movements recorded on certain titles little before the attacks were common. We show that, for certain companies like American Airlines, United Airlines, Merrill Lynch, Bank of America, Citigroup, Marsh & McLehnan, movements are scarce from a statistical point of view, a fortiori in comparison to the volumes observed for other values like Coke or Hewlett-Packard, explains Marc Chesney, a former professor with (the prestigious business school) HEC, author of “Money Laundering and Financing of Terrorism” (published by Ellipses Editions).
“For example, 1.535 contracts of options to sell in the term October 2001, with 30 dollars, were exchanged on American Airlines on September 10, against a daily average of approximately 24 contracts over the three previous weeks “the fact that the market is bear at the time” does not explain enough these surprising volumes “
“Enormous” profits:
The authors also studied the profitability of the options to sell, and of purchase, for an investor having bought a product between the 6th and the 10th “For certain titles, the profits were enormous. For example, investors having acquired options to sell of Citigroup with a maturity at October 2001 could potentially have gained more than 15 million dollars “,He said.
The conjunction of the data between volumes and profitability, the two authors conclude “the probability that there were offences of initiates (insider trading) is strong for American Airlines, United Airlines, Merrill Lynch, Bank of America, Citigroup and JP Morgan.
It is not a legal proof but it is the findings of statistical methods confirming signs of irregularities “.
The study is certainly not the first on possible insider trading in connection to the attacks but it is disconcerting in comparison with the conclusions of the regulatory authorities. As of September 2001, the Securities Exchange Commission and its European counterparts were interested in the atypical stock exchange movements before the attacks.
In an official statement of July 2004, the American regulator stated that it examined more than 9,5 million transactions in the weeks preceding September 11, then delivered its conclusions to the National Commission on the terrorist attacks (The 9/11 Comission).
According to this commission, unusual transactions certainly took place but each had a non-criminal explanation. The authorities evoke, for example, analyst’s investor advice to explain certain rises of volumes.
Same tone from the ex-COB now the AMF (French SEC), which states in its annual report of 2002: “the elements obtained forbid to show any evidence that financial groups related to the instigators of the attacks could have used the Stock Exchange to realise operations”
MARINA ALCARAZ
http://www.lesechos.fr/info/marches/4620847.htm
0 Comments
profitting from 9 11 ?
deutsche bank A.B.
merrill lynch/hsbc
morgan stanley
bank of america
raytheon
lehman brothers
general motors
axa re
merrill lynch/hsbc
morgan stanley
bank of america
raytheon
lehman brothers
general motors
axa re
operation northwoods
Operation Northwoods, or Northwoods, was a 1962 plan by the US Department of Defense to cause acts of simulated or real terrorism and violence on US soil or against US interests, blamed on Cuba, in order to generate U.S. public support for military action against the Cuban government of Fidel Castro. As part of the U.S. government's Operation Mongoose anti-Castro initiative, the plan, which was not implemented, called for various false flag actions, including simulated or real state-sponsored acts of terrorism (such as hijacked planes) on U.S. and Cuban soil. The plan was proposed by senior U.S. Department of Defense leaders, including the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Lyman Louis Lemnitzer.
http://www.retakingamerica.com/northwoods_page_1.html
Content
In response to a request for pretexts for military intervention by the Chief of Operations of the Cuba Project, Brig. Gen. Edward Lansdale, the document lists methods (with, in some cases, outlined plans) the authors believed would garner public and international support for U.S. military intervention in Cuba. These are staged attacks purporting to be of Cuban origin, with a number of them having real casualties. Central to the plan was the use of "friendly Cubans"—Cuban exiles seeking to oust Fidel Castro.
The proposals included:
Starting rumors about Cuba by using clandestine radios.
Staging mock attacks, sabotages and riots at Guantanamo Bay and blaming them on Cuban forces.
Blowing up a U.S. ship in Guantánamo Bay and blaming it on Cuba—reminiscent of the destruction of the USS Maine at Havana in 1898, which helped to precipitate the Spanish-American War. (The document's first suggestion regarding the sinking of a U.S. ship is to blow up a ship at sea and hence would result in U.S. Navy members being killed, with a secondary suggestion of possibly using an unmanned ship and fake funerals instead.)
"Harassment of civil air, attacks on surface shipping and destruction of US military drone aircraft by MIG type [sic] planes would be useful as complementary actions."
Destroying an unmanned drone masquerading as a commercial aircraft supposedly full of "college students off on a holiday". This proposal was the one supported by the Joint Chiefs of Staff.
Staging a "terror campaign", including the "real or simulated" sinking of Cuban refugees:
"We could develop a Communist Cuban terror campaign in the Miami area, in other Florida cities and even in Washington. The terror campaign could be pointed at refugees seeking haven in the United States. We could sink a boatload of Cubans enroute [sic] to Florida (real or simulated). We could foster attempts on lives of Cuban refugees in the United States even to the extent of wounding in instances to be widely publicized. Exploding a few plastic bombs in carefully chosen spots, the arrest of Cuban agents and the release of prepared documents substantiating Cuban involvement, also would be helpful in projecting the idea of an irresponsible government."
Burning crops by dropping incendiary devices in Haiti, the Dominican Republic or elsewhere.
Journalist James Bamford summarized Operation Northwoods in his April 24, 2001 book Body of Secrets:
Operation Northwoods, which had the written approval of the Chairman and every member of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, called for innocent people to be shot on American streets; for boats carrying refugees fleeing Cuba to be sunk on the high seas; for a wave of violent terrorism to be launched in Washington, D.C., Miami, and elsewhere. People would be framed for bombings they did not commit; planes would be hijacked. Using phony evidence, all of it would be blamed on Castro, thus giving Lemnitzer and his cabal the excuse, as well as the public and international backing, they needed to launch their war.[13]
[edit] Related Operation Mongoose proposals
In addition to Operation Northwoods, under the Operation Mongoose program the Department of Defense had a number of similar proposals to be taken against the Cuban regime of Fidel Castro.
Twelve of these proposals come from a February 2, 1962 memorandum entitled "Possible Actions to Provoke, Harass or Disrupt Cuba," written by Brig. Gen. William H. Craig and submitted to Brig. Gen. Edward Lansdale, the commander of the Operation Mongoose project.[14][5][6][7]
The memorandum outlines Operation Bingo, a plan to, in its words, "create an incident which has the appearance of an attack on U.S. facilities (GMO) in Cuba, thus providing an excuse for use of U.S. military might to overthrow the current government of Cuba."
It also includes Operation Dirty Trick, a plot to blame Castro if the 1962 Mercury manned space flight carrying John Glenn crashed, saying "The objective is to provide irrevocable proof that, should the MERCURY manned orbit flight fail, the fault lies with the Communists et al Cuba [sic]." It continues, "This to be accomplished by manufacturing various pieces of evidence which would prove electronic interference on the part of the Cubans."
Even after General Lyman Lemnitzer lost his job as the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the Joint Chiefs of Staff still planned false-flag pretext operations at least into 1963. A different Department of Defense policy paper created in 1963 discussed a plan to make it appear that Cuba had attacked a member of the Organization of American States (OAS) so that the United States could retaliate. The Pentagon document says of one of the scenarios, "A contrived 'Cuban' attack on an OAS member could be set up, and the attacked state could be urged to take measures of self-defense and request assistance from the U.S. and OAS." The plan expresses confidence that by this action "the U.S. could almost certainly obtain the necessary two-thirds support among OAS members for collective action against Cuba."[15][13]
Included in the nations the Joint Chiefs suggested as targets for covert attacks were Jamaica and Trinidad-Tobago. Since both were members of the British Commonwealth, the Joint Chiefs hoped that by secretly attacking them and then falsely blaming Cuba, the United States could incite the people of the United Kingdom into supporting a war against Castro.[13] As the Pentagon report noted,
Any of the contrived situations described above are inherently, extremely risky in our democratic system in which security can be maintained, after the fact, with very great difficulty. If the decision should be made to set up a contrived situation it should be one in which participation by U.S. personnel is limited only to the most highly trusted covert personnel. This suggests the infeasibility of the use of military units for any aspect of the contrived situation.[13]
The Pentagon report even suggested covertly paying a person in the Castro government to attack the United States: "The only area remaining for consideration then would be to bribe one of Castro's subordinate commanders to initiate an attack on [the U.S. Navy base at] Guantanamo."[13]
[edit] Reaction
It has been reported that John F. Kennedy personally rejected the Northwoods proposal, but no official record of this exists. The proposal was sent for approval to the Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara, but was not implemented. President Kennedy removed General Lyman Lemnitzer as Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff shortly afterward, although he became Supreme Allied Commander of NATO in January 1963.
The continuing push against the Cuban government by internal elements of the U.S. military and intelligence community (the failed Bay of Pigs Invasion, the Cuban Project, etc.) prompted President John F. Kennedy to attempt to rein in burgeoning hardline anti-Communist sentiment that was intent on proactive, aggressive action against communist movements around the globe. After the Bay of Pigs, John F. Kennedy fired then CIA director Allen W. Dulles, Deputy Director Charles P. Cabell, as well as Deputy Director Richard Bissell, and turned his attention towards Vietnam.
Kennedy also took steps to bring discipline to the CIA's Cold War and paramilitary operations by drafting a National Security Action Memorandum (NSAM) which called for the shift of Cold War operations to the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the Pentagon as well as a major change in the role of the CIA to exclusively deal in intelligence gathering.
On August 3, 2001, the National Assembly of People's Power of Cuba (the main legislative body of the Republic of Cuba) issued a statement
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Northwoods
http://www.retakingamerica.com/northwoods_page_1.html
Content
In response to a request for pretexts for military intervention by the Chief of Operations of the Cuba Project, Brig. Gen. Edward Lansdale, the document lists methods (with, in some cases, outlined plans) the authors believed would garner public and international support for U.S. military intervention in Cuba. These are staged attacks purporting to be of Cuban origin, with a number of them having real casualties. Central to the plan was the use of "friendly Cubans"—Cuban exiles seeking to oust Fidel Castro.
The proposals included:
Starting rumors about Cuba by using clandestine radios.
Staging mock attacks, sabotages and riots at Guantanamo Bay and blaming them on Cuban forces.
Blowing up a U.S. ship in Guantánamo Bay and blaming it on Cuba—reminiscent of the destruction of the USS Maine at Havana in 1898, which helped to precipitate the Spanish-American War. (The document's first suggestion regarding the sinking of a U.S. ship is to blow up a ship at sea and hence would result in U.S. Navy members being killed, with a secondary suggestion of possibly using an unmanned ship and fake funerals instead.)
"Harassment of civil air, attacks on surface shipping and destruction of US military drone aircraft by MIG type [sic] planes would be useful as complementary actions."
Destroying an unmanned drone masquerading as a commercial aircraft supposedly full of "college students off on a holiday". This proposal was the one supported by the Joint Chiefs of Staff.
Staging a "terror campaign", including the "real or simulated" sinking of Cuban refugees:
"We could develop a Communist Cuban terror campaign in the Miami area, in other Florida cities and even in Washington. The terror campaign could be pointed at refugees seeking haven in the United States. We could sink a boatload of Cubans enroute [sic] to Florida (real or simulated). We could foster attempts on lives of Cuban refugees in the United States even to the extent of wounding in instances to be widely publicized. Exploding a few plastic bombs in carefully chosen spots, the arrest of Cuban agents and the release of prepared documents substantiating Cuban involvement, also would be helpful in projecting the idea of an irresponsible government."
Burning crops by dropping incendiary devices in Haiti, the Dominican Republic or elsewhere.
Journalist James Bamford summarized Operation Northwoods in his April 24, 2001 book Body of Secrets:
Operation Northwoods, which had the written approval of the Chairman and every member of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, called for innocent people to be shot on American streets; for boats carrying refugees fleeing Cuba to be sunk on the high seas; for a wave of violent terrorism to be launched in Washington, D.C., Miami, and elsewhere. People would be framed for bombings they did not commit; planes would be hijacked. Using phony evidence, all of it would be blamed on Castro, thus giving Lemnitzer and his cabal the excuse, as well as the public and international backing, they needed to launch their war.[13]
[edit] Related Operation Mongoose proposals
In addition to Operation Northwoods, under the Operation Mongoose program the Department of Defense had a number of similar proposals to be taken against the Cuban regime of Fidel Castro.
Twelve of these proposals come from a February 2, 1962 memorandum entitled "Possible Actions to Provoke, Harass or Disrupt Cuba," written by Brig. Gen. William H. Craig and submitted to Brig. Gen. Edward Lansdale, the commander of the Operation Mongoose project.[14][5][6][7]
The memorandum outlines Operation Bingo, a plan to, in its words, "create an incident which has the appearance of an attack on U.S. facilities (GMO) in Cuba, thus providing an excuse for use of U.S. military might to overthrow the current government of Cuba."
It also includes Operation Dirty Trick, a plot to blame Castro if the 1962 Mercury manned space flight carrying John Glenn crashed, saying "The objective is to provide irrevocable proof that, should the MERCURY manned orbit flight fail, the fault lies with the Communists et al Cuba [sic]." It continues, "This to be accomplished by manufacturing various pieces of evidence which would prove electronic interference on the part of the Cubans."
Even after General Lyman Lemnitzer lost his job as the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the Joint Chiefs of Staff still planned false-flag pretext operations at least into 1963. A different Department of Defense policy paper created in 1963 discussed a plan to make it appear that Cuba had attacked a member of the Organization of American States (OAS) so that the United States could retaliate. The Pentagon document says of one of the scenarios, "A contrived 'Cuban' attack on an OAS member could be set up, and the attacked state could be urged to take measures of self-defense and request assistance from the U.S. and OAS." The plan expresses confidence that by this action "the U.S. could almost certainly obtain the necessary two-thirds support among OAS members for collective action against Cuba."[15][13]
Included in the nations the Joint Chiefs suggested as targets for covert attacks were Jamaica and Trinidad-Tobago. Since both were members of the British Commonwealth, the Joint Chiefs hoped that by secretly attacking them and then falsely blaming Cuba, the United States could incite the people of the United Kingdom into supporting a war against Castro.[13] As the Pentagon report noted,
Any of the contrived situations described above are inherently, extremely risky in our democratic system in which security can be maintained, after the fact, with very great difficulty. If the decision should be made to set up a contrived situation it should be one in which participation by U.S. personnel is limited only to the most highly trusted covert personnel. This suggests the infeasibility of the use of military units for any aspect of the contrived situation.[13]
The Pentagon report even suggested covertly paying a person in the Castro government to attack the United States: "The only area remaining for consideration then would be to bribe one of Castro's subordinate commanders to initiate an attack on [the U.S. Navy base at] Guantanamo."[13]
[edit] Reaction
It has been reported that John F. Kennedy personally rejected the Northwoods proposal, but no official record of this exists. The proposal was sent for approval to the Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara, but was not implemented. President Kennedy removed General Lyman Lemnitzer as Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff shortly afterward, although he became Supreme Allied Commander of NATO in January 1963.
The continuing push against the Cuban government by internal elements of the U.S. military and intelligence community (the failed Bay of Pigs Invasion, the Cuban Project, etc.) prompted President John F. Kennedy to attempt to rein in burgeoning hardline anti-Communist sentiment that was intent on proactive, aggressive action against communist movements around the globe. After the Bay of Pigs, John F. Kennedy fired then CIA director Allen W. Dulles, Deputy Director Charles P. Cabell, as well as Deputy Director Richard Bissell, and turned his attention towards Vietnam.
Kennedy also took steps to bring discipline to the CIA's Cold War and paramilitary operations by drafting a National Security Action Memorandum (NSAM) which called for the shift of Cold War operations to the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the Pentagon as well as a major change in the role of the CIA to exclusively deal in intelligence gathering.
On August 3, 2001, the National Assembly of People's Power of Cuba (the main legislative body of the Republic of Cuba) issued a statement
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Northwoods
Thursday, October 25, 2007
architects and engineers for 9 11 truth
plans of 9 11 buildings
http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/plans/frames.html
aeHome · Announcements · Speaking Engagements · Join Us · Help Us! · Discussion Forum · WTC 7 · Twin Towers · Blueprints · Online Store
Press · Web Resources · Contact Us · About Us · Tributes · Members · What Can I Do? · Downloads · Tech Articles
Members of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth
Select a Group to View
All Supporters (Warning: Large Document)
All A&E's
Architects (Degreed & Licensed)
Architectural Professionals (Degreed)
Engineers (Degreed & Licensed)
Engineering Professionals (Degreed)
Non-U.S. Architects and Engineers & Architectural and Engineering Professionals
Other Supporters and A&E Students (Warning: Large Document)
Select a Supporter to ViewAlbert V. BurnsBarry K. MillerBasil OrechwaCharles A. MarshallCharles N. PegelowChester W. GearhartCurtiss Lee PalinDavid E. CasselDennis J. KollarDennis M. FischerDerek JohnsonDonald MeserlianEdward MunyakFred NguyenJ. Marx AyresJack KellerJames R. CarrJeffrey M. MoskinJohn F. ShanahanJohn FranklinJohn M. SparnichtJohn V. MizziJoseph TestaKenneth WrennMichael E. StephensMichael S. BenefieldMichael T. DonlyMike MaguireMitchell Scott SteinPeter D. MorseRichard J. SniderRobert Lloyd NielsenRoland Edward AngleRon Paul LeBlancSteven Craig BrantinghamSteven ReiserTim RohachWilliam D. TaylorWilliam J. Cundiff
Engineers (Degreed & Licensed)
Engineers (Degreed & Licensed)
(please upload photo)
Albert V. Burns
P.E. (Ret. AZ. Prof. Civil Engr.) *
Lic: AZ civil engineer #2631, status: retired
BS Civ. Engr. Univ. Of AZ. 1951
Spanish Fork, Utah Engineering — Degreed and Licensed
• Bio:
(pending verification)
• Personal 9/11 Statement:
(pending verification)
Basil Orechwa
Senior Design Engineer
Lic: 32173-6 exp 2008
Wisconsin PE #32173
Beaver Dam, WI Engineering — Degreed and Licensed
• Bio:
Practicing civil engineering since 1975.
Currently with:
Kunkel Engineering Group
Beaver Dam, Wisconsin
• Personal 9/11 Statement:
I have reviewed the government 9/11 report and media footage. In my opinion the government story is simply not credible. Unfortunately, the physical evidence has been destroyed, leaving us to determine who ultimately benefited from this terrorism. This is how any competent criminal investigation would begin from this point forward. Further Congressional hearings are in order until this matter is resolved.
(please upload photo)
Charles A. Marshall
PE, MSCE *
Lic: 9396 civil engineer exp 2008
MS, Civil Engineering,USC
San Gabriel, CA Engineering — Degreed and Licensed
• Bio:
(pending verification)
• Personal 9/11 Statement:
(pending verification)
(please upload photo)
Chester W. Gearhart
P.E., Retired
Lic: Retired
B.S. Civil Engineering, Univ of Missouri
Kansas City, MO Engineering — Degreed and Licensed
• Bio:
I was forced to retire in 2002. I had a long Public Works career for the City of Kansas City, MO as a sewer and street designer and a plan reviewer. I college I had a strong interest and aptitude for structures and architecture. I have reviewed many construction plans for buildings and have watched construction of many large structures in KC. I no longer practice engineering but I have been researching 9/11 since it happened.
• Personal 9/11 Statement:
I have watched the construction of many large buildings and also have personally witnessed 5 controlled demolitions in KC. When I saw the towers fall on 9/11 I knew something was wrong and my first instinct was that it was impossible. When I saw building 7 fall I knew it was a CD. Why was there so many video cameras aimed at B7 when it fell if it was unexpected? Some coincidence. I have been studying this subject since it happened. I can find no evidence that any of the official story, even events other than the 3 buildings, makes any sense or is even possible.
(please upload photo)
Curtiss Lee Palin
P.E.
Lic: Colorado 27315 Professional Engineer exp 2009
MS Engineering
Fort Collins, CO Engineering — Degreed and Licensed
• Bio:
[pending review]
• Personal 9/11 Statement:
[pending review]
(please upload photo)
David E. Cassel
P.E.
Lic: P-5352 Mechanical Engineering exp 2008
B.S. Mechanical Engineering
Oldtown, ID Engineering — Degreed and Licensed
• Bio:
Engineering work in solar energy, conservation, building science, manufactured housing. Also one year of graduate work in PhD program in economics.
• Personal 9/11 Statement:
Only refusal to look at the issues would prevent any thinking person from coming to the conclusion that the planes did not bring down the buildings.
(please upload photo)
Dennis M. Fischer
Engineering Consultant *
MSCE, BSCE
Naperville, IL Engineering — Degreed
• Bio:
(pending verification)
• Personal 9/11 Statement:
(pending verification)
(please upload photo)
Dennis J. Kollar
P.E., Structural Engineer
Lic: 34422-6 professional engineer exp 2008
B.S. + Graduate Coursework
West Bend, WI Engineering — Degreed and Licensed
• Bio:
I began my career in the 1980's as a Structurally Certified Welder and held various welding positions in a shop fabrication environment. I received my B.S. in Civil Engineering from the University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee in 1993 with an emphasis in Structural Engineering. I have several years experience in Municipal Engineering and site design and 10+ Years experience in the structural design of residential, commercial, industrial, and institutional structures of steel, concrete, masonry and timber.
• Personal 9/11 Statement:
For me the most convincing aspect that the 911 collapse was a controlled demolition is the recorded explosions on the 9/11 Eyewitness DVD. The explosions, along with the uniformity and totality of the collapses, when added to the 100's of so-called coincidences on, before and after that day, add up to more evidence of a Government involved crime than has convicted most people in our prisons today.
(please upload photo)
Derek Johnson
E.I.T., C.W.I.
Lic: EIT #37893
B.S. Mechanical Engineering
Marlin, Texas Engineering — Degreed and Licensed
• Bio:
Licensed Engineer in Training in Texas, E.I.T. #37893 University of Texas at Arlington, will take P.E. exam in 2009, also American Welding Society Certified Welding Inspector, structural steel AWS D1.1.
• Personal 9/11 Statement:
I did a much simplified finite element analysis of the 9-11 structures (twins and Solomon) using ANSYS w/the autodyn plug in. The speed of the falls and the downward force impulses that would have been created by the plane damage made many at UTA suspicious of the 9-11 investigation report. It is my opinion that a more complete and thorough FEA survey than the one I performed will help erode the credibility of the 9-11 report of record, and provide political pressure to bring those responsible for the 9-11 murders to trial. I am willing to volunteer time in working toward this goal, if anyone is interested and has access to FEA software, please contact me at cattleprods [at] hotmail.com and I will donate time to further this cause.
(please upload photo)
Donald Meserlian
P.E.
MSME
N. Caldwell, NJ Engineering — Degreed and Licensed
• Bio:
[pending review]
• Personal 9/11 Statement:
[pending review]
(please upload photo)
Edward Munyak
P.E.
Lic: Mechanical 16804 Fire Protection 247
BSME Catholic University of America
Los Altos Hills, CA Engineering — Degreed and Licensed
• Bio:
Registered Mechanical and Fire Protection Engineer in the State of California. Currently working as a fire protection engineer for the city of San Jose, CA
• Personal 9/11 Statement:
I have collaborated with a research chemical engineer( P.E. in CA also) and he has worked with NIST reports that positively show that the jet fuel contributed very little to the duration of the fires and that in fact all the fires were very weak in historical perspective. They were oxygen starved as evidenced by the black smoke. If you dig deeper into the NIST reports they confirm that steel temperatures were low.
I presented for continuing education credits at the NFPA World Safety Conference in Boston, MA 6/4/2007
My presentation showed that all three WTC "collapses" have no resemblance to any previous high rise fire, full scale fire tests in the UK involving much higher steel temperatures, or computer simulations using finite element analysis.
(please upload photo)
Fred Nguyen
P.E.
M.S. Mech. Eng., Stevens Inst. of Tech.
Maplewood, NJ Engineering — Degreed and Licensed
• Bio:
Sr. Energy Engineer for major controls company.
28 years experience in the energy industry.
Masters of Mechanical Engineering (energy conversion and thermodynamics).
Licensed P.E. state of N.J.
• Personal 9/11 Statement:
I do not believe that the combination of air plane crashes and fires led to the collapse of WTC 1, 2 and 7.
(please upload photo)
Jack Keller
Ph.D., P.E.
Lic: 139070-2202 issued 1961, exp 2009
Logan, UT Engineering — Degreed and Licensed
• Bio:
My education includes a B.S. in Civil Engineering from the University of Colorado (1953), M.S. in Irrigation Engineering from Colorado State University (1955), and Ph.D. in Agricultural and Irrigation Engineering from Utah State University (1967). I am still professionally active and my career has been split between academia (teaching, research, and extension) and private consulting and focused on irrigation engineering activities related to water resource development and management.
• Personal 9/11 Statement:
Without any serious study I had simply accepted that the events of 9/11 were as commonly perceived, although I was not happy with the way the disaster was being used to promote what I felt were illegal and self defeating imperialistic policies in the guise of the War on Terrorism. It was not until early 2006 that I stumbled upon sufficient information to become suspicious of the "official" and generally accepted 9/11 storyline. This led me to do my own investigation during which I discovered the demise of WTC 7, which I was heretofore unaware of. Obviously it was the result of controlled demolition and scheduled to take place during the confusion surrounding the day’s events. I now feel morally obligated to deal with and expose the "politically unthinkable" issues surrounding the 9/11 phenomena by participating in such undertakings as signing this petition.
(please upload photo)
Jeffrey M. Moskin
B.S.E.E. *
B.S.E.E.
Culver City, CA Engineering — Degreed
• Bio:
(pending verification)
• Personal 9/11 Statement:
(pending verification)
(please upload photo)
John V. Mizzi
P.E.
B.E.E.
Poughkeepsie, NY Engineering — Degreed and Licensed
• Bio:
My BEE is from Pratt Institute (1963); I also have graduate credits at U. of PA and other institutions. I was an engineer at IBM for 26 years. Currently a consulting patent engineer. I am named inventor of 27 U.S. patents.
• Personal 9/11 Statement:
Upon reviewing the work of Prof. Jones, Jim Hoffman, and others, as well as NIST reports: my opinion is that these "collapses" could not have happened without the use of some sort of explosive, barring repeal of laws of physics!
(please upload photo)
Kenneth Wrenn
P.E. *
B.S., Civil Engineering, NCSU
Durham, NC Engineering — Degreed and Licensed
• Bio:
(pending verification)
• Personal 9/11 Statement:
(pending verification)
(please upload photo)
Michael S. Benefield
Mechanical Engineer
Lic: 31102 Mechanical Engineer exp 2009
B.S. Mechanical Engineering
San Anselmo, CA Engineering — Degreed and Licensed
• Bio:
Graduated from the University of Utah in 1994. Currently working as an asbestos consultant in the State of California.
• Personal 9/11 Statement:
It appears that the NIST report fails to account for known physical evidence found on the scene, and indeed seems to contradict fundamental physical laws. Therefore it cannot be accepted. An independent investigation with full subpoena power is needed.
(please upload photo)
Michael T. Donly
P.E., Structural/Civil Engineer *
B.S.C.E. New Jersey Institute of Technol
Hackensack, NJ Engineering — Degreed and Licensed
• Bio:
(pending verification)
• Personal 9/11 Statement:
(pending verification)
(please upload photo)
Michael E. Stephens
P.E.
Lic: OK 20643 exp 2009; AK 11302
B.S., Geological Engineering
Welling, OK Engineering — Degreed and Licensed
• Bio:
Self employed as a general Civil Engineering Consultant, obtained B.S. degree in Geological Engineering with minor in Hazardous Waste Management from NMSU in 1994.
• Personal 9/11 Statement:
It was apparent to me from the day of 9/11 that the buildings did not fall due to catastrophic failure initiating from the impact by jet planes. If the towers had fallen due to anything but a controlled demolition, they would have taken out several city blocks and most adjacent buildings would have also been taken down by the towers.
(please upload photo)
Mike Maguire
P.E. *
MS, Mech/Aero Engineering, UC Davis
Livermore, CA Engineering — Degreed and Licensed
• Bio:
(pending verification)
• Personal 9/11 Statement:
(pending verification)
(please upload photo)
Mitchell Scott Stein
P.E.
Lic: env pe #84826
M.S. Civil Eng., Univ. of Texas at Austi
Austin, TX Engineering — Degreed and Licensed
• Bio:
Civil Engineering Site Designs; Potable Water Treatment Processes; Industrial Wastewater Treatment Processes
• Personal 9/11 Statement:
None of WTC 1, WTC 2, or WTC 7 could have fallen in the duration in took them to fall (on the order of 10 seconds), virtually directly downward, UNLESS the majority of their many key supporting structural elements on EACH FLOOR were 100% ineffective, or nearly 100% ineffective, and such a situation seems virtually 100% IMPLAUSIBLE, unless there was some sort of configuration for a controlled demolition in place PRIOR TO the planes hitting WTC 1 and WTC 2.
(please upload photo)
Peter D. Morse
P.E., Mechanical Engineer
Lic: Mechanical Engineer #38829 exp 2009
B.S., Mech. Engr., B.A., Journalism
Tucson, Arizona Other: Mechanical Engineering — Other: Licensed in 4 western states
• Bio:
My professional engineering career has been directed towards providing engineering design, procurement, and construction management services (EPCM) for very large capital expenditure projects for American industry as a member of large, multidisciplinary A/E teams.
• Personal 9/11 Statement:
"Those who have the privilege to know also have a duty to act." - Albert Einstein
I, like you, am privileged to be able to distinguish that the Official 9/11 Story defies natural law yet the observed phenomena of the day do not. I call on all my peers to understand and then expose the myths of the Official Story through the sound application of the natural laws that are the basis of our education and subsequent life's work. It is tragic but necessary that as engineers and architects this task looms large as our most important - and urgently needed - contribution.
(please upload photo)
Richard J. Snider
P.E.
Lic: PE electrical engineer license 73615, Texas
BSEE, University of Texas, Austin
Dallas, Dripping Springs, TX Engineering — Degreed and Licensed
• Bio:
Network Engineer - Grad in 1969. Commute from Dallas to Austin weekly - operate small WISP business west of Austin. Married 34 years, 2 Children
• Personal 9/11 Statement:
Physics of collapse, Clear indication of pre-planted explosives, and all the surrounding standdowns and pre-indications of major event on Sept. 11 indicate need for full re-examination of this crime.
(please upload photo)
Roland Edward Angle
Civil Engineer
Lic: 18242 Civil Engineer exp 2009
B.S. U.C. Berkeley
Alameda, CA Engineering — Degreed and Licensed
• Bio:
CA License 18242. Forty years experience in Civil & Military design, analysis & construction, including blast analysis of nuclear hardened facilities.
• Personal 9/11 Statement:
The official explanation of the building failures defies known scientific methods of analyses and is untenable in the face of logical investigation.
(please upload photo)
Steven Craig Brantingham
P.E.
Lic: OK PE License #13027 1982, exp. 9/09
B.S., ChemE, U. of Arkansas Fayetteville
Cypress, TX Engineering — Degreed and Licensed
• Bio:
I graduated in 1973 from the U. of Arkansas. I have 34 years experience in project and process engineering in the natural gas industry.
• Personal 9/11 Statement:
I first became aware of the 9/11 Truth movement in 2005, after viewing David Ray Griffin's presentation on C-SPAN. I then began researching the inconsistencies in the official story and have concluded that it is impossible that the events of 9/11 occurred the way the government claims they did.
(please upload photo)
Steven Reiser
Chemical Engineer
Lic: 10-7-07 bg emailed to ask for license number
Westminster, CO Engineering — Degreed and Licensed
• Bio:
Double B.S. - Chemical Engineering/Chemistry at University of Idaho 1978 - worked in Mining, Metal Refining R&D, Natural Gas Processing, Oil Refining, Nuclear Fuel Reprocessing R&D, and program management.
• Personal 9/11 Statement:
All engineering Student are required to take Engineering Physics, and Engineering Statics and Dynamics Courses, these give us the basic scientific and engineering principles to evaluate technical issues such as this. I have also worked with high explosives in government work in the past. I can state with confidence that the building collapses which happen at free fall such as on 9/11 require the violent controlled destruction of the support structures in order to effect a complete collapse of the structures as occurred on 9/11/2001.
(please upload photo)
William J. Cundiff
P.E. *
BSCE
Whitinsville, MA Engineering — Degreed and Licensed
• Bio:
(pending verification)
• Personal 9/11 Statement:
(pending verification)
(please upload photo)
William D. Taylor
P.E.
Lic: Florida P.E. license #56163
B.S. Engineering
Tequesta, FL Engineering — Degreed and Licensed
• Bio:
Licensed Professional Civil Engineer in the State of Florida.
Graduate of the University of Florida, 1995, with a B.S. in Engineering.
• Personal 9/11 Statement:
I remember back to September 11, 2001 when the towers fell how shocked I was to actually see them fall. Based on my knowledge of structures and seeing the fires in the buildings appear to subside, I figured that the buildings would be salvageable. As many did, I did not question what I saw. However, when I woke up and researched further years later, I confirmed my initial gut feeling that the official story was not accurate.
(please upload photo)
Barry K. Miller
P.E., Mechanical Engineer
Lic: California Mechanical Engineer #27447 exp 6/09
Hinsdale, NY Engineering — Degreed and Licensed
• Bio:
(please enter a short bio)
• Personal 9/11 Statement:
(please enter a personal 9/11 statement)
(please upload photo)
Charles N. Pegelow
PE, Civil Engineer. lic Calif CE 26344 (Structural
Lic: Calif license 26344 Civil Engineer, exp 2008
Houston, Texas Engineering — Degreed and Licensed
• Bio:
(please enter a short bio)
• Personal 9/11 Statement:
(please enter a personal 9/11 statement)
(please upload photo)
J. Marx Ayres
PE, Mechanical Engineer
Lic: 10631 mechanical
Santa Monica, CA Engineering — Degreed and Licensed
• Bio:
(please enter a short bio)
• Personal 9/11 Statement:
(please enter a personal 9/11 statement)
(please upload photo)
James R. Carr
Ph.D., P.E.(geological engineering,, Professor, Ge
Lic: 007464 Geological Engineer 1987, exp 2008
Reno, Nevada Engineering — Degreed and Licensed
• Bio:
(please enter a short bio)
• Personal 9/11 Statement:
(please enter a personal 9/11 statement)
(please upload photo)
John Franklin
P.E. *
Lubec, ME Engineering — Degreed and Licensed
• Bio:
(please enter a short bio)
• Personal 9/11 Statement:
(please enter a personal 9/11 statement)
(please upload photo)
John F. Shanahan
PE, Electrical Engineer
Lic: 12091 electrical
Rancho Cucamonga, CA Engineering — Degreed and Licensed
• Bio:
(please enter a short bio)
• Personal 9/11 Statement:
(please enter a personal 9/11 statement)
(please upload photo)
John M. Sparnicht
P.E., Civil Engineer, California
Lic: CA license #89504 Civil Engineer, exp 12/31/07
Dayton, NV Engineering — Degreed and Licensed
• Bio:
(please enter a short bio)
• Personal 9/11 Statement:
(please enter a personal 9/11 statement)
(please upload photo)
Joseph Testa
P.E., Civil Engineer
Lic: PE 072702 New York License
Thousand Oaks, CA Engineering — Degreed and Licensed
• Bio:
(please enter a short bio)
• Personal 9/11 Statement:
(please enter a personal 9/11 statement)
(please upload photo)
Robert Lloyd Nielsen
PLS, Land Surveyor
Lic: 8075 Land Surveying exp 12/31/07
Walnut Creek, CA Engineering — Degreed and Licensed
• Bio:
(please enter a short bio)
• Personal 9/11 Statement:
(please enter a personal 9/11 statement)
(please upload photo)
Ron Paul LeBlanc
PE, Engineer
Lic: PE license 38312
Firestone, CO Engineering — Degreed and Licensed
• Bio:
(please enter a short bio)
• Personal 9/11 Statement:
(please enter a personal 9/11 statement)
(please upload photo)
Tim Rohach
P.E., Mechanical Engineer MSME
Sugar Land, Texas Engineering — Degreed and Licensed
• Bio:
(please enter a short bio)
• Personal 9/11 Statement:
(please enter a personal 9/11 statement)
aeHome · Announcements · Speaking Engagements · Join Us · Help Us! · Discussion Forum · WTC 7 · Twin Towers · Blueprints · Online Store
Press · Web Resources · Contact Us · About Us · Tributes · Members · What Can I Do? · Downloads · Tech Articles
Copyright © 2007 by ae911truth.org — All Rights Reserved · Contact the Webmaster · This page has been accessed 242 times.
http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/plans/frames.html
aeHome · Announcements · Speaking Engagements · Join Us · Help Us! · Discussion Forum · WTC 7 · Twin Towers · Blueprints · Online Store
Press · Web Resources · Contact Us · About Us · Tributes · Members · What Can I Do? · Downloads · Tech Articles
Members of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth
Select a Group to View
All Supporters (Warning: Large Document)
All A&E's
Architects (Degreed & Licensed)
Architectural Professionals (Degreed)
Engineers (Degreed & Licensed)
Engineering Professionals (Degreed)
Non-U.S. Architects and Engineers & Architectural and Engineering Professionals
Other Supporters and A&E Students (Warning: Large Document)
Select a Supporter to ViewAlbert V. BurnsBarry K. MillerBasil OrechwaCharles A. MarshallCharles N. PegelowChester W. GearhartCurtiss Lee PalinDavid E. CasselDennis J. KollarDennis M. FischerDerek JohnsonDonald MeserlianEdward MunyakFred NguyenJ. Marx AyresJack KellerJames R. CarrJeffrey M. MoskinJohn F. ShanahanJohn FranklinJohn M. SparnichtJohn V. MizziJoseph TestaKenneth WrennMichael E. StephensMichael S. BenefieldMichael T. DonlyMike MaguireMitchell Scott SteinPeter D. MorseRichard J. SniderRobert Lloyd NielsenRoland Edward AngleRon Paul LeBlancSteven Craig BrantinghamSteven ReiserTim RohachWilliam D. TaylorWilliam J. Cundiff
Engineers (Degreed & Licensed)
Engineers (Degreed & Licensed)
(please upload photo)
Albert V. Burns
P.E. (Ret. AZ. Prof. Civil Engr.) *
Lic: AZ civil engineer #2631, status: retired
BS Civ. Engr. Univ. Of AZ. 1951
Spanish Fork, Utah Engineering — Degreed and Licensed
• Bio:
(pending verification)
• Personal 9/11 Statement:
(pending verification)
Basil Orechwa
Senior Design Engineer
Lic: 32173-6 exp 2008
Wisconsin PE #32173
Beaver Dam, WI Engineering — Degreed and Licensed
• Bio:
Practicing civil engineering since 1975.
Currently with:
Kunkel Engineering Group
Beaver Dam, Wisconsin
• Personal 9/11 Statement:
I have reviewed the government 9/11 report and media footage. In my opinion the government story is simply not credible. Unfortunately, the physical evidence has been destroyed, leaving us to determine who ultimately benefited from this terrorism. This is how any competent criminal investigation would begin from this point forward. Further Congressional hearings are in order until this matter is resolved.
(please upload photo)
Charles A. Marshall
PE, MSCE *
Lic: 9396 civil engineer exp 2008
MS, Civil Engineering,USC
San Gabriel, CA Engineering — Degreed and Licensed
• Bio:
(pending verification)
• Personal 9/11 Statement:
(pending verification)
(please upload photo)
Chester W. Gearhart
P.E., Retired
Lic: Retired
B.S. Civil Engineering, Univ of Missouri
Kansas City, MO Engineering — Degreed and Licensed
• Bio:
I was forced to retire in 2002. I had a long Public Works career for the City of Kansas City, MO as a sewer and street designer and a plan reviewer. I college I had a strong interest and aptitude for structures and architecture. I have reviewed many construction plans for buildings and have watched construction of many large structures in KC. I no longer practice engineering but I have been researching 9/11 since it happened.
• Personal 9/11 Statement:
I have watched the construction of many large buildings and also have personally witnessed 5 controlled demolitions in KC. When I saw the towers fall on 9/11 I knew something was wrong and my first instinct was that it was impossible. When I saw building 7 fall I knew it was a CD. Why was there so many video cameras aimed at B7 when it fell if it was unexpected? Some coincidence. I have been studying this subject since it happened. I can find no evidence that any of the official story, even events other than the 3 buildings, makes any sense or is even possible.
(please upload photo)
Curtiss Lee Palin
P.E.
Lic: Colorado 27315 Professional Engineer exp 2009
MS Engineering
Fort Collins, CO Engineering — Degreed and Licensed
• Bio:
[pending review]
• Personal 9/11 Statement:
[pending review]
(please upload photo)
David E. Cassel
P.E.
Lic: P-5352 Mechanical Engineering exp 2008
B.S. Mechanical Engineering
Oldtown, ID Engineering — Degreed and Licensed
• Bio:
Engineering work in solar energy, conservation, building science, manufactured housing. Also one year of graduate work in PhD program in economics.
• Personal 9/11 Statement:
Only refusal to look at the issues would prevent any thinking person from coming to the conclusion that the planes did not bring down the buildings.
(please upload photo)
Dennis M. Fischer
Engineering Consultant *
MSCE, BSCE
Naperville, IL Engineering — Degreed
• Bio:
(pending verification)
• Personal 9/11 Statement:
(pending verification)
(please upload photo)
Dennis J. Kollar
P.E., Structural Engineer
Lic: 34422-6 professional engineer exp 2008
B.S. + Graduate Coursework
West Bend, WI Engineering — Degreed and Licensed
• Bio:
I began my career in the 1980's as a Structurally Certified Welder and held various welding positions in a shop fabrication environment. I received my B.S. in Civil Engineering from the University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee in 1993 with an emphasis in Structural Engineering. I have several years experience in Municipal Engineering and site design and 10+ Years experience in the structural design of residential, commercial, industrial, and institutional structures of steel, concrete, masonry and timber.
• Personal 9/11 Statement:
For me the most convincing aspect that the 911 collapse was a controlled demolition is the recorded explosions on the 9/11 Eyewitness DVD. The explosions, along with the uniformity and totality of the collapses, when added to the 100's of so-called coincidences on, before and after that day, add up to more evidence of a Government involved crime than has convicted most people in our prisons today.
(please upload photo)
Derek Johnson
E.I.T., C.W.I.
Lic: EIT #37893
B.S. Mechanical Engineering
Marlin, Texas Engineering — Degreed and Licensed
• Bio:
Licensed Engineer in Training in Texas, E.I.T. #37893 University of Texas at Arlington, will take P.E. exam in 2009, also American Welding Society Certified Welding Inspector, structural steel AWS D1.1.
• Personal 9/11 Statement:
I did a much simplified finite element analysis of the 9-11 structures (twins and Solomon) using ANSYS w/the autodyn plug in. The speed of the falls and the downward force impulses that would have been created by the plane damage made many at UTA suspicious of the 9-11 investigation report. It is my opinion that a more complete and thorough FEA survey than the one I performed will help erode the credibility of the 9-11 report of record, and provide political pressure to bring those responsible for the 9-11 murders to trial. I am willing to volunteer time in working toward this goal, if anyone is interested and has access to FEA software, please contact me at cattleprods [at] hotmail.com and I will donate time to further this cause.
(please upload photo)
Donald Meserlian
P.E.
MSME
N. Caldwell, NJ Engineering — Degreed and Licensed
• Bio:
[pending review]
• Personal 9/11 Statement:
[pending review]
(please upload photo)
Edward Munyak
P.E.
Lic: Mechanical 16804 Fire Protection 247
BSME Catholic University of America
Los Altos Hills, CA Engineering — Degreed and Licensed
• Bio:
Registered Mechanical and Fire Protection Engineer in the State of California. Currently working as a fire protection engineer for the city of San Jose, CA
• Personal 9/11 Statement:
I have collaborated with a research chemical engineer( P.E. in CA also) and he has worked with NIST reports that positively show that the jet fuel contributed very little to the duration of the fires and that in fact all the fires were very weak in historical perspective. They were oxygen starved as evidenced by the black smoke. If you dig deeper into the NIST reports they confirm that steel temperatures were low.
I presented for continuing education credits at the NFPA World Safety Conference in Boston, MA 6/4/2007
My presentation showed that all three WTC "collapses" have no resemblance to any previous high rise fire, full scale fire tests in the UK involving much higher steel temperatures, or computer simulations using finite element analysis.
(please upload photo)
Fred Nguyen
P.E.
M.S. Mech. Eng., Stevens Inst. of Tech.
Maplewood, NJ Engineering — Degreed and Licensed
• Bio:
Sr. Energy Engineer for major controls company.
28 years experience in the energy industry.
Masters of Mechanical Engineering (energy conversion and thermodynamics).
Licensed P.E. state of N.J.
• Personal 9/11 Statement:
I do not believe that the combination of air plane crashes and fires led to the collapse of WTC 1, 2 and 7.
(please upload photo)
Jack Keller
Ph.D., P.E.
Lic: 139070-2202 issued 1961, exp 2009
Logan, UT Engineering — Degreed and Licensed
• Bio:
My education includes a B.S. in Civil Engineering from the University of Colorado (1953), M.S. in Irrigation Engineering from Colorado State University (1955), and Ph.D. in Agricultural and Irrigation Engineering from Utah State University (1967). I am still professionally active and my career has been split between academia (teaching, research, and extension) and private consulting and focused on irrigation engineering activities related to water resource development and management.
• Personal 9/11 Statement:
Without any serious study I had simply accepted that the events of 9/11 were as commonly perceived, although I was not happy with the way the disaster was being used to promote what I felt were illegal and self defeating imperialistic policies in the guise of the War on Terrorism. It was not until early 2006 that I stumbled upon sufficient information to become suspicious of the "official" and generally accepted 9/11 storyline. This led me to do my own investigation during which I discovered the demise of WTC 7, which I was heretofore unaware of. Obviously it was the result of controlled demolition and scheduled to take place during the confusion surrounding the day’s events. I now feel morally obligated to deal with and expose the "politically unthinkable" issues surrounding the 9/11 phenomena by participating in such undertakings as signing this petition.
(please upload photo)
Jeffrey M. Moskin
B.S.E.E. *
B.S.E.E.
Culver City, CA Engineering — Degreed
• Bio:
(pending verification)
• Personal 9/11 Statement:
(pending verification)
(please upload photo)
John V. Mizzi
P.E.
B.E.E.
Poughkeepsie, NY Engineering — Degreed and Licensed
• Bio:
My BEE is from Pratt Institute (1963); I also have graduate credits at U. of PA and other institutions. I was an engineer at IBM for 26 years. Currently a consulting patent engineer. I am named inventor of 27 U.S. patents.
• Personal 9/11 Statement:
Upon reviewing the work of Prof. Jones, Jim Hoffman, and others, as well as NIST reports: my opinion is that these "collapses" could not have happened without the use of some sort of explosive, barring repeal of laws of physics!
(please upload photo)
Kenneth Wrenn
P.E. *
B.S., Civil Engineering, NCSU
Durham, NC Engineering — Degreed and Licensed
• Bio:
(pending verification)
• Personal 9/11 Statement:
(pending verification)
(please upload photo)
Michael S. Benefield
Mechanical Engineer
Lic: 31102 Mechanical Engineer exp 2009
B.S. Mechanical Engineering
San Anselmo, CA Engineering — Degreed and Licensed
• Bio:
Graduated from the University of Utah in 1994. Currently working as an asbestos consultant in the State of California.
• Personal 9/11 Statement:
It appears that the NIST report fails to account for known physical evidence found on the scene, and indeed seems to contradict fundamental physical laws. Therefore it cannot be accepted. An independent investigation with full subpoena power is needed.
(please upload photo)
Michael T. Donly
P.E., Structural/Civil Engineer *
B.S.C.E. New Jersey Institute of Technol
Hackensack, NJ Engineering — Degreed and Licensed
• Bio:
(pending verification)
• Personal 9/11 Statement:
(pending verification)
(please upload photo)
Michael E. Stephens
P.E.
Lic: OK 20643 exp 2009; AK 11302
B.S., Geological Engineering
Welling, OK Engineering — Degreed and Licensed
• Bio:
Self employed as a general Civil Engineering Consultant, obtained B.S. degree in Geological Engineering with minor in Hazardous Waste Management from NMSU in 1994.
• Personal 9/11 Statement:
It was apparent to me from the day of 9/11 that the buildings did not fall due to catastrophic failure initiating from the impact by jet planes. If the towers had fallen due to anything but a controlled demolition, they would have taken out several city blocks and most adjacent buildings would have also been taken down by the towers.
(please upload photo)
Mike Maguire
P.E. *
MS, Mech/Aero Engineering, UC Davis
Livermore, CA Engineering — Degreed and Licensed
• Bio:
(pending verification)
• Personal 9/11 Statement:
(pending verification)
(please upload photo)
Mitchell Scott Stein
P.E.
Lic: env pe #84826
M.S. Civil Eng., Univ. of Texas at Austi
Austin, TX Engineering — Degreed and Licensed
• Bio:
Civil Engineering Site Designs; Potable Water Treatment Processes; Industrial Wastewater Treatment Processes
• Personal 9/11 Statement:
None of WTC 1, WTC 2, or WTC 7 could have fallen in the duration in took them to fall (on the order of 10 seconds), virtually directly downward, UNLESS the majority of their many key supporting structural elements on EACH FLOOR were 100% ineffective, or nearly 100% ineffective, and such a situation seems virtually 100% IMPLAUSIBLE, unless there was some sort of configuration for a controlled demolition in place PRIOR TO the planes hitting WTC 1 and WTC 2.
(please upload photo)
Peter D. Morse
P.E., Mechanical Engineer
Lic: Mechanical Engineer #38829 exp 2009
B.S., Mech. Engr., B.A., Journalism
Tucson, Arizona Other: Mechanical Engineering — Other: Licensed in 4 western states
• Bio:
My professional engineering career has been directed towards providing engineering design, procurement, and construction management services (EPCM) for very large capital expenditure projects for American industry as a member of large, multidisciplinary A/E teams.
• Personal 9/11 Statement:
"Those who have the privilege to know also have a duty to act." - Albert Einstein
I, like you, am privileged to be able to distinguish that the Official 9/11 Story defies natural law yet the observed phenomena of the day do not. I call on all my peers to understand and then expose the myths of the Official Story through the sound application of the natural laws that are the basis of our education and subsequent life's work. It is tragic but necessary that as engineers and architects this task looms large as our most important - and urgently needed - contribution.
(please upload photo)
Richard J. Snider
P.E.
Lic: PE electrical engineer license 73615, Texas
BSEE, University of Texas, Austin
Dallas, Dripping Springs, TX Engineering — Degreed and Licensed
• Bio:
Network Engineer - Grad in 1969. Commute from Dallas to Austin weekly - operate small WISP business west of Austin. Married 34 years, 2 Children
• Personal 9/11 Statement:
Physics of collapse, Clear indication of pre-planted explosives, and all the surrounding standdowns and pre-indications of major event on Sept. 11 indicate need for full re-examination of this crime.
(please upload photo)
Roland Edward Angle
Civil Engineer
Lic: 18242 Civil Engineer exp 2009
B.S. U.C. Berkeley
Alameda, CA Engineering — Degreed and Licensed
• Bio:
CA License 18242. Forty years experience in Civil & Military design, analysis & construction, including blast analysis of nuclear hardened facilities.
• Personal 9/11 Statement:
The official explanation of the building failures defies known scientific methods of analyses and is untenable in the face of logical investigation.
(please upload photo)
Steven Craig Brantingham
P.E.
Lic: OK PE License #13027 1982, exp. 9/09
B.S., ChemE, U. of Arkansas Fayetteville
Cypress, TX Engineering — Degreed and Licensed
• Bio:
I graduated in 1973 from the U. of Arkansas. I have 34 years experience in project and process engineering in the natural gas industry.
• Personal 9/11 Statement:
I first became aware of the 9/11 Truth movement in 2005, after viewing David Ray Griffin's presentation on C-SPAN. I then began researching the inconsistencies in the official story and have concluded that it is impossible that the events of 9/11 occurred the way the government claims they did.
(please upload photo)
Steven Reiser
Chemical Engineer
Lic: 10-7-07 bg emailed to ask for license number
Westminster, CO Engineering — Degreed and Licensed
• Bio:
Double B.S. - Chemical Engineering/Chemistry at University of Idaho 1978 - worked in Mining, Metal Refining R&D, Natural Gas Processing, Oil Refining, Nuclear Fuel Reprocessing R&D, and program management.
• Personal 9/11 Statement:
All engineering Student are required to take Engineering Physics, and Engineering Statics and Dynamics Courses, these give us the basic scientific and engineering principles to evaluate technical issues such as this. I have also worked with high explosives in government work in the past. I can state with confidence that the building collapses which happen at free fall such as on 9/11 require the violent controlled destruction of the support structures in order to effect a complete collapse of the structures as occurred on 9/11/2001.
(please upload photo)
William J. Cundiff
P.E. *
BSCE
Whitinsville, MA Engineering — Degreed and Licensed
• Bio:
(pending verification)
• Personal 9/11 Statement:
(pending verification)
(please upload photo)
William D. Taylor
P.E.
Lic: Florida P.E. license #56163
B.S. Engineering
Tequesta, FL Engineering — Degreed and Licensed
• Bio:
Licensed Professional Civil Engineer in the State of Florida.
Graduate of the University of Florida, 1995, with a B.S. in Engineering.
• Personal 9/11 Statement:
I remember back to September 11, 2001 when the towers fell how shocked I was to actually see them fall. Based on my knowledge of structures and seeing the fires in the buildings appear to subside, I figured that the buildings would be salvageable. As many did, I did not question what I saw. However, when I woke up and researched further years later, I confirmed my initial gut feeling that the official story was not accurate.
(please upload photo)
Barry K. Miller
P.E., Mechanical Engineer
Lic: California Mechanical Engineer #27447 exp 6/09
Hinsdale, NY Engineering — Degreed and Licensed
• Bio:
(please enter a short bio)
• Personal 9/11 Statement:
(please enter a personal 9/11 statement)
(please upload photo)
Charles N. Pegelow
PE, Civil Engineer. lic Calif CE 26344 (Structural
Lic: Calif license 26344 Civil Engineer, exp 2008
Houston, Texas Engineering — Degreed and Licensed
• Bio:
(please enter a short bio)
• Personal 9/11 Statement:
(please enter a personal 9/11 statement)
(please upload photo)
J. Marx Ayres
PE, Mechanical Engineer
Lic: 10631 mechanical
Santa Monica, CA Engineering — Degreed and Licensed
• Bio:
(please enter a short bio)
• Personal 9/11 Statement:
(please enter a personal 9/11 statement)
(please upload photo)
James R. Carr
Ph.D., P.E.(geological engineering,, Professor, Ge
Lic: 007464 Geological Engineer 1987, exp 2008
Reno, Nevada Engineering — Degreed and Licensed
• Bio:
(please enter a short bio)
• Personal 9/11 Statement:
(please enter a personal 9/11 statement)
(please upload photo)
John Franklin
P.E. *
Lubec, ME Engineering — Degreed and Licensed
• Bio:
(please enter a short bio)
• Personal 9/11 Statement:
(please enter a personal 9/11 statement)
(please upload photo)
John F. Shanahan
PE, Electrical Engineer
Lic: 12091 electrical
Rancho Cucamonga, CA Engineering — Degreed and Licensed
• Bio:
(please enter a short bio)
• Personal 9/11 Statement:
(please enter a personal 9/11 statement)
(please upload photo)
John M. Sparnicht
P.E., Civil Engineer, California
Lic: CA license #89504 Civil Engineer, exp 12/31/07
Dayton, NV Engineering — Degreed and Licensed
• Bio:
(please enter a short bio)
• Personal 9/11 Statement:
(please enter a personal 9/11 statement)
(please upload photo)
Joseph Testa
P.E., Civil Engineer
Lic: PE 072702 New York License
Thousand Oaks, CA Engineering — Degreed and Licensed
• Bio:
(please enter a short bio)
• Personal 9/11 Statement:
(please enter a personal 9/11 statement)
(please upload photo)
Robert Lloyd Nielsen
PLS, Land Surveyor
Lic: 8075 Land Surveying exp 12/31/07
Walnut Creek, CA Engineering — Degreed and Licensed
• Bio:
(please enter a short bio)
• Personal 9/11 Statement:
(please enter a personal 9/11 statement)
(please upload photo)
Ron Paul LeBlanc
PE, Engineer
Lic: PE license 38312
Firestone, CO Engineering — Degreed and Licensed
• Bio:
(please enter a short bio)
• Personal 9/11 Statement:
(please enter a personal 9/11 statement)
(please upload photo)
Tim Rohach
P.E., Mechanical Engineer MSME
Sugar Land, Texas Engineering — Degreed and Licensed
• Bio:
(please enter a short bio)
• Personal 9/11 Statement:
(please enter a personal 9/11 statement)
aeHome · Announcements · Speaking Engagements · Join Us · Help Us! · Discussion Forum · WTC 7 · Twin Towers · Blueprints · Online Store
Press · Web Resources · Contact Us · About Us · Tributes · Members · What Can I Do? · Downloads · Tech Articles
Copyright © 2007 by ae911truth.org — All Rights Reserved · Contact the Webmaster · This page has been accessed 242 times.
Tuesday, October 23, 2007
bbc propaganda complete Nist refuted years ago fantasy
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/6987965.stmhttp://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/6987965.stm
whos behind9 11 vid
whos behind9 11 vid
supposed proff for 911
this is a very bad paper?! basicly wiffle woffle no hard data no hard analysis says itself this is not how it actually happened¬
notice the uk civil engineering association hasnt come out and said anything
wait for them they are the structural engineering overseers of the country and would rip the paper to pieces if it had any real life data in it but it doesnt
this is a very bad paper?! basicly wiffle woffle no hard data no hard analysis says itself this is not how it actually happened¬
notice the uk civil engineering association hasnt come out and said anything
wait for them they are the structural engineering overseers of the country and would rip the paper to pieces if it had any real life data in it but it doesnt
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)